The Russian automobile market has recently been replenished with another affordable model. In this case we are talking about the German budget car Volkswagen Polo in the new generation. Now this vehicle will be sold in a liftback body. The recently released new product has already caused numerous discussions among car enthusiasts, since it is literally a new car that can become a leader in its class of budget vehicles. That is why this model is worth comparing with another representative of the budget segment of the Russian assembly, Lada Vesta, in order to ultimately decide which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta.
Lada Vesta 2020
Comparison of technical characteristics
Since many motorists first of all, when choosing a vehicle, pay attention to the main technical characteristics, here it is necessary to highlight the most significant parameters of the presented cars, namely:
- Lada Vesta is sold in a sedan body, the German competitor is sold in a liftback body;
- the domestic model consumes AI-92 fuel, rival AI-95;
- both cars can only be purchased in front-wheel drive versions;
- public sector vehicles are available in petrol versions;
- average fuel consumption in the combined cycle is 6.4 liters. for Polo, 6.9 l. at West;
- Lada's maximum speed is 175 km/h, Volkswagen's is 184 km/h;
- the German accelerates to the first hundred in 11.4 s, the Russian model in 11.2 s;
- The cars belong to the Euro-5 environmental safety class.
In this case, similar cars in the most affordable variations were compared. It is noteworthy that a domestic car can also be purchased with gas equipment, however, such modifications are not particularly in demand.
Motors
In the table below you can see a comparison of engines offered by the manufacturer for motorists.
Vesta | Vs | Polo (sedan) |
VAZ-21129: 106hp | VW 1.6 – 85 hp | |
VAZ-21179: 122hp | VW 1.6 – 110 hp | |
HR16DE: 110hp |
Note that the internal combustion engine from the German concern installed in the Polo has the same displacement (1.6 l), but there are still some differences:
We recommend: What tools should you always carry with you?
The first modification from the table has 85 hp. at good speed parameters. A car with such an engine accelerates to hundreds in 11.9 seconds. The maximum speed of such a car is 179 km/h.
The second internal combustion engine already contains 110 “horses”. Acceleration time to 100 km/h is 10.5 seconds. The highest achievable speed of this modification is 190 km/h.
The domestic manufacturer offers its customers three modifications of engines with 106, 110 and 122 hp, respectively:
The 1.6L has the lowest-power Vesta engine. A car equipped with such an engine accelerates to hundreds in 12.4 seconds, and the maximum speed of such a car is 178 km/h.
The next unit has 110 “horses” under the hood and allows it to accelerate to 100 km/h in 10.3 seconds. The highest speed achieved is 170 km/h.
The engine with the most powerful efficiency installed in the Russian new product already contains 1.8 liters, has a maximum speed of 185 km/h and allows acceleration to 100 km/h in 10.9 seconds.
Now let's look at the fuel consumption table for both cars:
Model | Consumption | ||
City | Mix | Route | |
Vesta 1.6l-1.8l (106-122 hp) | 8.5l-8.6l | 6.8l-7.2l | 5.7l-5.9l |
Polo 1.6l (85-110 hp) | 7l-7.6 l | 5.5l-6l | 5l -5.5 l |
Gasoline consumption for both cars is almost identical, with some advantage for the Volkswagen Polo. Also, the domestic new product is a little slower than the German representative, although Vesta’s internal combustion engines have more power.
Engines and transmission
Another key point that potential buyers of a budget car should pay attention to when choosing a Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta is the power unit. In this regard, state employees received good equipment, although the German liftback looks more interesting, for the simple reason that there are three alternative engines, as well as three transmissions to choose from depending on the version of the car. For the domestic model, the manufacturer has provided only two main engines and two gearboxes. It can be said directly that in the case of the Lada Vesta, the choice is really meager, despite the fact that this car has been sold on the Russian car market for five years.
The new German model Volkswagen Polo in a liftback body can be purchased with a naturally aspirated 1.6-liter engine with a capacity of 90 and 110 horsepower, depending on the degree of boost. This motor allows you to transmit 155 N*m of torque to the wheels. This power plant can be paired with a 5-speed manual gearbox or a modern 6-speed automatic transmission. There is also a more interesting variation of the car available for sale with a turbocharged 1.4-liter unit with an output of 125 horsepower and 200 Nm of torque. This motor interacts exclusively with a robotic 7-speed DSG gearbox. This model can only be purchased in a front-wheel drive version.
The Russian car did not receive a charged version, unlike its German competitor, and we can safely say that the Lada Vesta is inferior in terms of power, since it uses the already familiar 1.6 and 1.8 liter engines with output of 106 and 122 horsepower and 148 – 170 N*m of torque. As for models equipped with LPG, they are equipped primarily with a 1.6-liter unit producing 113 hp. and a 5-speed manual transmission. Gasoline naturally aspirated modifications of the car are equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission, as well as a 5-speed robot. Some versions of the car use a CVT, although this gearbox has not gained serious distribution and popularity.
Suspension
If we compare the suspension of the Lada Vesta and the Volkswagen Polo, we get approximately the same solutions. Both manufacturers abandoned the multi-link rear suspension in favor of a semi-independent beam. Traditional MacPherson struts at the front. In terms of comfort, there is no clear winner. Vesta is taller and more comfortable to drive on uneven roads. The Polo has more refined handling, but the ground clearance is lower and this causes discomfort when driving on uneven roads.
Ride quality, maneuverability and handling
Since many Russian car enthusiasts cannot afford the opportunity to purchase an off-road vehicle, they are interested in whether budget cars can boast of at least some cross-country ability? As practice shows, these front-wheel drive models are not suitable for off-road use, even when there is no precipitation for a long time. Does not allow you to cope with terrain where there is no road surface as such, low ground clearance, low weight and lack of all-wheel drive. Of course, this does not mean that such cars cannot be used for active recreation; simply, there is a high probability that outside help will be required if the car gets stuck.
If we talk about the driving performance and handling of the German Volkswagen Polo, then this is an excellent model, which, although it has a rather stiff suspension, can at the same time please with its dynamics and maneuverability. The car holds the road perfectly, and in addition, instantly reacts even to a slight turn of the steering wheel. It is worth noting that the ground clearance of this model is only 170 mm, which will be quite enough for the city and the highway. German manufacturers equipped their cars with an independent spring suspension at the front and a semi-independent spring system at the rear. There are anti-roll bars on each axle, which prevents the car from rolling during sharp turns at high speed and when maneuvering. There are ventilated disc brakes at the front and drum or conventional disc brakes at the rear, depending on the configuration.
The Russian Lada Vesta is a good budget sedan with a rigid suspension, which allows you not to worry about the support components. The suspension system in this model is reliable and unpretentious. This vehicle has mediocre handling, but at the same time good driving performance. The car handles the road well and has excellent dynamics. Of course, in comparison with the German liftback, the difference is immediately felt, however, do not forget that the domestic model is noticeably cheaper. At the front, this car is equipped with an independent MacPherson spring suspension and anti-roll bars. At the rear, the manufacturers installed a semi-independent spring system with drum brakes. There are ventilated disc brakes at the front.
Features of the models
Of course, even in a frankly budget sedan, the pedantic Germans did not abandon following their principles. So the famous reliability has not gone away, and if we add to this the noble pedigree and the no less popular emblem emblazoned on the hood, then we should expect that the model will be super popular, including in Russia.
Vesta can only dream of all these components; prestige is still the weakest point of the domestic brand. But is it just the VW nameplate?
Both cars are produced exclusively as a sedan. But here Lada has room to move: in the future it is planned to release a station wagon and a hatchback, which will undoubtedly increase the number of fans of the domestic brand. Moreover, the debut of the station wagon, they say, is scheduled for this year.
In terms of dimensions, the Vesta is slightly larger than the German (4.41 x 1.76 x 1.49 meters versus 4.39 x 1.70 x 1.47 m for the German). The ground clearance is expectedly greater for the Russian sedan - 17.8 cm versus 16.3, but the gap is not as large as most Vesta fans would like. The trunk volume is also larger in the Lada - 480 liters, in the Polo - 460 liters. Well, our sedan weighs a little more - 1.23 tons versus 1.16 for the German, although in running order the leaders change places (1.67 versus 1.7 tons).
Vesta is more spacious due to its larger wheelbase (2.64 m versus 2.55 m for Volkswagen).
Comparison of configurations and prices
If you need to choose which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta in terms of price, then you won’t have to think long about it, for the simple reason that a domestic car is an order of magnitude cheaper than its competitor. In addition, potential buyers can count on numerous discounts when purchasing this model, as well as participation in various government support programs. If we talk about technical equipment, then the German car has a clear advantage, for the simple reason that it is a newer car than its rival. In terms of basic configurations, there is practically no difference; both cars have four of them. However, if necessary, potential buyers can choose Lada Vesta with an extended package of options.
At the moment, Russian buyers can purchase the German-made Volkswagen Polo liftback for 792,900 – 1,209,900 rubles. This model is sold in four basic trim levels. We are talking about modifications Origin, Respect, Status and Exclusive. The most budget model does not boast an abundance of options, and there is only a number of electronic aids and assistants, as well as tire pressure sensors, a 12V socket, active power steering, a modern multimedia system, standard audio preparation and a number of other functions. As for the more expensive versions, rich equipment is added here, including keyless access to the car interior, remote engine start, LED optics, DRL and fog lights, advanced audio preparation, light and rain sensors, parking sensors, cruise control, and climate control and a variety of electronic driver assistance systems.
Options and prices (Volkswagen Polo)
# | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
1 | 1.4 TSI DSG Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 209 900 | Front | Manual transmission 7 | 1395 | 9.3 | 204 | 125 (92) / 6000 | 6,0 |
2 | 1.4 TSI DSG Status | 2020 — | 1 069 900 | Front | Manual transmission 7 | 1395 | 9.3 | 204 | 125 (92) / 6000 | 6,0 |
3 | 1.6 MPI MT Origin | 2020 — | 792 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 11.4 | 184 | 90 (66) / 4250 | 6,4 |
4 | 1.6 MPI MT Respect | 2020 — | 837 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 11.4 | 184 | 90 (66) / 4250 | 6,4 |
5 | 1.6 MPI MT Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 111 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
6 | 1.6 MPI MT Respect | 2020 — | 877 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
7 | 1.6 MPI MT Status | 2020 — | 971 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
8 | 1.6 MPI AT Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 161 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
9 | 1.6 MPI AT Respect | 2020 — | 927 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
10 | 1.6 MPI AT Status | 2020 — | 1 021 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
The Russian budget sedan Lada Vesta can currently be purchased for 653,900 – 973,900 rubles. This car is also sold in four main modifications: Classic, Comfort, Luxe and Exclusive. In the most budget version, the car is equipped with a number of electronic assistants and driver assistants, power steering, audio preparation, as well as a standard multimedia system and daytime running lights. As the cost increases, options such as a modern multimedia complex, rear parking sensors, a rear view camera, cruise control, 1-zone climate control, a cooled glove box, and a multifunction steering wheel are added to this sedan.
Options and prices (Lada Vesta)
# | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
1 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2020 — | 721 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
2 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 765 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
3 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 757 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
4 | 1.6MT Classic | November 2021 — | 653 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
5 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | November 2021 — | 690 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
6 | 1.6MT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 878 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
7 | 1.6MT Luxe | November 2021 — | 783 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
8 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 824 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
9 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 — | 846 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
10 | 1.6MT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 697 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
11 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
12 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2021 - 2020 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
13 | 1.6MT Standard | 2019 - November 2019 | 606 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
14 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 807 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
15 | 1.6MT Classic | 2018 - November 2019 | 609 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
16 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 651 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
17 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 679 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
18 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 702 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
19 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 700 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
20 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2016 - December 2017 | 645 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
21 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
22 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
23 | 1.6 MT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 735 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
24 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
25 | 1.6MT Classic | 2016 - December 2017 | 569 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
26 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 594 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
27 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start 6FD package | 2015 - December 2015 | 544 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
28 | 1.6 MT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 514 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
29 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime Multimedia X4P package | 2015 — 2016 | 652 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
30 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime X00 package | 2015 — 2016 | 628 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
31 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 599 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
32 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 623 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
33 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 647 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
34 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 622 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
35 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 — 2018 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
36 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2018 - November 2018 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
37 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 676 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
38 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 704 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
39 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 710 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
40 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 795 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
41 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 760 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
42 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
43 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 619 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
44 | 1.6 AMT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 569 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
45 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + XV Line package | 2015 - December 2015 | 663 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
46 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Lime Multimedia package X4P | 2015 — 2016 | 677 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
47 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Lime X00 | 2015 — 2016 | 653 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
48 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 624 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
49 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 648 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
50 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 672 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
51 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 647 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
52 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2015 - December 2017 | 670 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
53 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2020 — | 891 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
54 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 927 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
55 | 1.6 CNG MT Classic + Start package | 2017 — | 860 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 7,5 |
56 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe | 2017 — | 953 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
57 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2017 — | 994 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
58 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2017 — 2020 | 879 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
59 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | 2020 — | 816 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
60 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 860 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
61 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 852 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
62 | 1.6 CVT Classic + Start Plus package | November 2021 — | 785 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
63 | 1.6 CVT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 973 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
64 | 1.6 CVT Luxe | November 2021 — | 878 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
65 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 919 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
66 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 — | 941 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
67 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 782 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
68 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 805 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
69 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2021 – December 2020 | 813 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
70 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2020 — | 756 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
71 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 792 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
72 | 1.8MT Exclusive | November 2021 — | 913 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
73 | 1.8MT Luxe | November 2021 — | 818 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
74 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2021 — | 859 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
75 | 1.8MT Comfort | November 2021 - 2020 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
76 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2021 - 2020 | 755 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
77 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2021 - 2020 | 872 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
78 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 843 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
79 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 714 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
80 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 737 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
81 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
82 | 1.8MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
83 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 763 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
84 | 1.8MT Comfort | October 2021 – December 2017 | 657 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
85 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 680 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
86 | 1.8MT Luxe | October 2021 – December 2017 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
87 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 748 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
88 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
89 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 848 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
90 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2018 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
91 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 762 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
92 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 881 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
93 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 830 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
94 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 824 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
95 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | October 2021 – December 2017 | 682 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
96 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 705 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
97 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2021 – December 2017 | 773 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
Price for minimum and maximum configurations
The minimum cost of a Lada Vesta is 512,920 rubles, and the maximum is 741,960. We need to start with the fact that all Lada configurations are distinguished by very good safety; it is great that the manufacturer did not skimp on the lives of the owners of cheap models, leaving the main difference in the functionality and characteristics of the cars. The basic equipment of Vesta is not rich in terms of functionality, but everything you need and even a little more is there, for example, heated windows and seats. However, there is a lack of air conditioning, which we will return to later. But with an increase in price, Vesta’s interior becomes more and more modern and functional. “TouchScreen” with a diagonal of 7 inches, light and rain sensors, parking sensors, navigation, 6 speakers, 16-inch casting, stepped seat heating and a lot of other options that perhaps not everyone will even use!
The Polo sedan offers a minimum price of 599,900 rubles and a maximum of 919,900. The car is quite more expensive, but why? Let's start with the fact that in the basic configuration less attention is paid to safety than in the West, there are only two airbags instead of four, the only plus of the basic configuration of the Polo is the presence of air conditioning, without which cars are no longer bought. The most expensive Volkswagen Polo model has all the same options as the most expensive Vesta, with the exception of superiority over Russian cars due to Climatronic climate control. Thus, for the basic equipment of the Polo, you can buy a Vesta already equipped with additional benefits, and the latter will be safer.
Maintenance costs
Although these cars are presented in the same price segment, the prices for their maintenance vary significantly. Domestic cars provide significantly less financial maintenance costs. Moreover, there are never any difficulties finding spare parts and consumables, for the simple reason that everything you need is available in almost every auto parts store. With the Volkswagen Polo, things are more complicated, since this car only recently entered the Russian market. Moreover, prices for spare parts and consumables are slightly higher, although the difference in the first years of operation will not be so significant. As for everyday fuel costs, Lada Vesta once again looks like the favorite here, since this car consumes AI-92 fuel, which is an order of magnitude cheaper than gasoline with a higher octane number AI-95.
Dynamics, fuel consumption
The dominant 1.6-liter Vesta power unit allows the sedan to accelerate to “hundreds” in an acceptable 11.8 seconds, while the top speed is limited to 177 km/h. Consumption for an engine of this size is within the average range - 5.5 liters on the highway, 9.3 liters in the city and 6.9 liters on average.
If we compare the Vesta engines with the Polo Sedan, then even the 90-horsepower engine of the latter, due to its high elasticity, demonstrates similar dynamics (11.9 acceleration seconds), but in terms of efficiency it is far ahead - 5.1/8.7/6.4 liters per 100 km. respectively.
The 110-horsepower analogue is even faster - 10.5 seconds to reach “hundreds” at a “maximum speed” of 190 km/h. But, oddly enough, the consumption rate is no different from its less powerful brother.
Appearance and dimensions
These cars differ noticeably not only in terms of cost and technical equipment, but also in the case of appearance. Both models at first glance seem practical and reliable, however, taking a closer look, it becomes obvious that the Russian car is again inferior to its German competitor. The design of the Lada Vesta is somewhat outdated and requires modernization. The Volkswagen Polo liftback is a stylish and ultra-modern car that impresses with its practicality, but at the same time does not forget to stand out with numerous decorative elements. Particularly pleasant emotions are evoked by the rear and head optics, which have undergone major changes compared to its predecessor.
The Russian model is a fairly compact representative of its class, if you look at the numbers. However, if you put Volkswagen Polo and Lada Vesta next to each other, the difference will be almost invisible visually. Models have the following dimensions:
- Polo length is 4,469 mm, Vest’s is 4,410 mm;
- Volkswagen width is 1,706 mm, Lada is 1,764 mm;
- the height of the German liftback is 1,471 mm, that of the Russian sedan is 1,469 mm;
- wheelbase of the Lada is 2635 mm, that of the Volkswagen is 2591 mm;
- the curb weight of the Russian model is 1,230 kg, that of the German is 1,185 kg.
The sixth-generation German vehicle is longer than its competitor, however, the Lada Vesta is wider, which is why the cars have interiors that are almost identical in terms of the amount of free space.
Transmission models
The Vesta manual transmission is a Granta gearbox with modifications. Thanks to the replacement of several components using German and Japanese parts, it was possible to eliminate noise from the box, and it became easier to change gears. But this still cannot be compared with the Volkswagen box. Tempered by the experience of many models, the mechanics here are simply perfect. A clear adventure and a short stroke of the Polo mechanics, until they are achieved by the Togliatti concern.
Lada is inferior to its competitor in automatic transmission. But the Robot is not critically inferior; the foreign components of our robot show decent results, even in comparison with Polo.
Salon and trunk
Since it is necessary to make a full comparison of the Volkswagen Polo and Lada Vesta, we also have to consider the interior of the vehicle and the capacity of the luggage compartments. Regarding the first point, the German liftback is the undisputed favorite. In this model, the quality of the finish is especially impressive, and in addition, the high cost of the materials used. Also in the Volkswagen Polo there is a stylish design with numerous high-tech solutions. When looking at this car, it becomes obvious that the designers decided to significantly modernize the vehicle so that it fully complies with modern fashion trends.
The new Volkswagen Polo liftback has an attractive interior with a moderate color, where there are mainly dark shades. At first glance, the car captivates with its practicality, since the main elements are located strictly in their places to make the driver as comfortable as possible during the trip. Of course, the availability of free space is not the strong point of budget models. However, as for the German liftback, the car is almost equal to representatives of higher classes in this indicator. Among the key features, it is worth highlighting the huge display of the multimedia system, the stylish steering wheel and gear selector, as well as the digital instrument panel, which is provided in more expensive trim levels.
The Russian car in this case is outdated compared to its direct competitor. Moreover, the future owner will not be pleased with the quality of the interior trim, which is much inferior to other rivals in this segment. The interior design looks painfully familiar, and even at first glance it becomes clear that the designers were inspired by the interior of earlier Lada cars. The biggest drawbacks of the car are the large selector, the minimalistic climate control unit, and the center console, which is very forward in relation to the entire panel. As for the advantages, the most notable ones are the pleasant steering wheel, as well as the instrumentation, which has received ultra-modern instrument scales.
The luggage compartments of these cars do not differ so significantly, even though the German model is a liftback, where there is noticeably more space than in a standard sedan. The luggage compartment of the Lada Vesta holds an impressive 480 liters, which is enough for many motorists to transport all the necessary things. As for the German car, the trunk volume here is 530 liters, and at the same time, it can be increased almost three times. However, this will require folding down the rear row of passenger seats.
Salon
The car interior is naturally similar to the exterior. In the interior of the 2180 it is still the same tribute to sporty style: black plastic with metal inserts, measuring instruments recessed into metal wells with clear, legible readings, a relief that we have already seen on the body, which is still present in the cabin. The rear seats comfortably accommodate three people, the height is enough to comfortably sit people above average height, but there will still be people for whom it will not be enough.
The Polo salon is strict, laconic, simple. Here we thought about convenience, so that the driver would not be distracted by anything, including some non-standard solutions in the cabin. Looking into the German's interior, you can feel deja vu, but this is far from a minus. The manufacturer managed to concentrate on convenience, so the control panels are more informative and pleasant than those of Vesta. But it won’t be easy for three of us to fit in the back, this is a minus, and the situation with the ceiling is the same as with Vesta. Both cars demonstrate approximately equal, good visibility.
What is better to choose
Which car is better to choose is up to each car enthusiast to decide for himself. It is not so easy to single out a clear favorite among the presented models, even despite the clear superiority of the German liftback. This is due to the fact that domestic cars are much cheaper to purchase and subsequently maintain. As for other points, the Volkswagen Polo looks preferable. However, this does not mean that a Russian car can be immediately crossed out if you have the money to buy a Polo. Lada Vesta is also worthy of attention if you really need a reliable and unpretentious car.
Final choice
Despite the minimal differences in all components, the Polo's leadership is undeniable, especially considering the amazing price congruence. But the question of what to choose, Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta, remains not entirely resolved. The reason is differences in configuration. In some components the advantage is on the side of the Russian sedan, in others the German is superior.
In the middle trim levels, Vesta is better equipped; in general, there is equality at the top and bottom.
The same can be said about engines and their characteristics. The only advantage of Volkswagen is the presence of a full-fledged and reliable automatic transmission. For many potential buyers this is not critical, but there is a layer focused specifically on automatic transmission. For them, Polo will be the only option. As for the rest, Vesta looks more than decent.
Other options
When considering any of these cars for an upcoming purchase, do not forget that these are not the only representatives of their class that are now present on the car market in Russia. Also, a potential buyer can make a choice in favor of other state employees. In particular, here we are talking about cars from South Korea, namely the Hyundai Solaris and Kia Rio, a Czech-made car Skoda Rapid, as well as the Chinese representative of this segment Changan Alsvin. Each named machine deserves attention, as it can stand out from its competitors due to its key features.
What gearboxes are installed on Polo and Vesta
Both automakers made sure that their models were equipped with both manual and automatic transmissions. Mechanical enthusiasts on the Lada Vesta will receive a 5-speed gearbox, which was borrowed from the Priora. But in the process of creating the car, the old gearbox underwent many changes and improvements, and was equipped with the latest foreign parts - now Germany is responsible for the mechanical switching module, and Japan produces cable drives. All these factors and details helped us get a new gear shift system - now it has become much easier to shift, and the noise characteristic of old gearboxes is completely absent. The Vesta transmission can definitely be placed on the same level as the mechanics of imported manufacturers.
The Volkswagen Polo sedan puts a similar 5-speed manual transmission on the comparison scale. Volkswagen mechanics are a legend. The Volkswagen Polo manual transmission has all the properties of an impeccable transmission - short lever travel, smooth gear shifting and much more. Many car enthusiasts undoubtedly consider the transmissions of this car brand to be among the best in the world.
But the opponents’ machines are completely different. Lada Vesta is equipped with an AMT-type robotic transmission. And, of course, there are foreign components in the box. In general, the box copes with its function, works, switches, and creates the necessary conditions for ease of driving. AMT is quite far from the classic automatic transmission, it lacks the smoothness of gear shifting that everyone so wants to see in their automatic transmissions, but the VAZ gearbox is easier to operate and much cheaper, which significantly affects the overall price tag of the Lada Vesta car.
Polo has a 6-speed automatic transmission in its arsenal. There is no need to guess here, it surpasses Vesta’s AMT in all respects - clear and timely gear changes, ride comfort is higher, and the 6th gear takes care of your wallet, significantly reducing fuel consumption. But the price tag of a car with such an automatic transmission may surprise some people; the price is not small in comparison with its Russian competitor.
Suspension, ground clearance, interior
As for the interior, both models have a connection with the exterior. Vesta continues to lean towards her “X-shapedness”. If Vesta is an energetic choleric person, sometimes not very comfortable, then Polo is a pragmatist, he is very practical and reserved.
VESTA
POLO
There is not much to say about the suspension in both sedans: MacPherson strut in the front, beam in the rear. Vesta's shock absorbers, springs and suspension settings are more suitable for Russian roads, and it has more ground clearance.
Car suspension and handling
Here AvtoVAZ and Volkswagen AG did not take risks and none of the models has a multi-link chassis. This decision was made to reduce the overall cost of cars. The car is equipped with parts familiar to this class - MacPherson struts at the front, semi-independent suspension at the rear.
Volkswagen Polo is considered to be an example of handling among sedans of this class. Lada Vesta was able to reach the level of the standard, but, without a doubt, it was not without a doubt; nevertheless, in some small details it loses to the German. The advantage of the Lada is its high ground clearance, while the disadvantage of the Volkswagen is the low location of the rear spring supports. The supports are strong, but when you hit an obstacle, a noticeable grinding noise causes discomfort.
Interior
The development approach differs radically.
- Lada Vesta takes a turn towards aggression and sporty surroundings. The center console and dashboard look attractive. Black plastic wraps around the front of the cabin and blends harmoniously with everything else.
- The readings from the sensors are easy to read, the control keys are located rationally and conveniently. There is a multi-level seat configuration, and there is more freedom and spaciousness in the back.
- Every element inside the Volkswagen Polo knows its place and is located where it is needed. A comfortable steering wheel, a slightly inclined center console, black plastic framing the entire interior, an easy-to-read instrument panel - all this contributes to incomparable comfort and reliability.
- The seats are tight and can be adjusted; there will be plenty of space for two passengers in the back. For safety, two airbags are provided.